1974 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1999 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1999 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-3 | 1999 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | RX-3 | SS |
Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 76 L |