1974 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision weights approximately 100 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision (189 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda RX-3 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RX-3 | Vision |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1899 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 189 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 62 L |
