1974 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2002 Saturn SC
To start off, 2002 Saturn SC is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda RX-3 | 2002 Saturn SC | |
| Make | Mazda | Saturn |
| Model | RX-3 | SC |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
