1974 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2009 Tata B-Line
To start off, 2009 Tata B-Line is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Tata B-Line. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata B-Line.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Tata B-Line, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata B-Line. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata B-Line.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mazda RX-3 | 2009 Tata B-Line | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | RX-3 | B-Line |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1404 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 37 L |