1974 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 293 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-4. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mazda RX-4 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RX-4 | F200 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 408 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
