1974 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1999 Saturn SC

To start off, 1999 Saturn SC is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-4 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1999 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1999 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1999 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Saturn SC. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Saturn SC.

Compare all specifications: