1974 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2000 Mini MK VII

To start off, 2000 Mini MK VII is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-4 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.

Compare all specifications: