1974 Mini Clubman vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Mini Clubman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 166 kg more than 1974 Mini Clubman.
Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mini Clubman | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mini | Smart |
Model | Clubman | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 1820 mm |