1974 Mini MK III vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Mini MK III is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1974 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Mini MK III | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mini | Triumph |
Model | MK III | 2000 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |