1974 Mini MK III vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1984 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Mini MK III | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Mini | Chevrolet |
| Model | MK III | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 2473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2580 mm |
