1974 Mini MK III vs. 1993 Renault Clio

To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 290 kg more than 1974 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mini MK III. 1993 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1974 Mini MK III has manual transmission. 1974 Mini MK III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: