1974 Mini MK III vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1974 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mini MK III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mini MK III.

Compare all specifications: