1974 Mitsubishi Jeep vs. 1982 Pontiac Phoenix

To start off, 1982 Pontiac Phoenix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Phoenix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep weights approximately 370 kg more than 1982 Pontiac Phoenix.

Because 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Pontiac Phoenix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1974 Mitsubishi Jeep 1982 Pontiac Phoenix
Make Mitsubishi Pontiac
Model Jeep Phoenix
Year Released 1974 1982
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2198 cc 2474 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1520 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2670 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]