1974 Nissan 240 C vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 61 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra.
Because 1974 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1974 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1974 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Nissan 240 C | 1996 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | 240 C | Integra |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4525 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1325 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |
