1974 Nissan 240 C vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 2 kg more than 1974 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1974 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Nissan 240 C | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | 240 C | Reno |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1262 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
