1974 Nissan 240 C vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 208 kg more than 1974 Nissan 240 C.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1974 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1974 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Nissan 240 C | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | 240 C | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1468 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |
