1974 Nissan 240 C vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 70 kg more than 1974 Nissan 240 C.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1974 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1974 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Nissan 240 C | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | 240 C | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |