1974 Nissan Cedric vs. 2002 Audi A6
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1974 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1974 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (330 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Nissan Cedric | 2002 Audi A6 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Cedric | A6 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |