1974 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2002 Samsung SM3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,388 cc, 1974 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2002 Samsung SM3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1974 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 NSU Ro 80 | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | NSU | Samsung |
| Model | Ro 80 | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2388 cc | 1497 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |
