1974 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2002 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2002 Toyota Camry is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Camry (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1974 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1974 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Camry weights approximately 250 kg more than 1974 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Camry (279 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1974 NSU Ro 80 | 2002 Toyota Camry | |
Make | NSU | Toyota |
Model | Ro 80 | Camry |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2388 cc | 2995 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1460 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |