1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,269 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (108 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 411 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass (279 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
Model | Cutlass | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4269 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2660 mm |