1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 260 more horse power than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (380 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Audi |
| Model | Cutlass | R8 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 420 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2649 mm |
