1974 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1974 Reliant Scimitar. (123 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1974 Reliant Scimitar.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Reliant Scimitar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Reliant Scimitar (267 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Subaru Outback. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1974 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Reliant Scimitar | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Reliant | Subaru |
| Model | Scimitar | Outback |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2994 cc | 2455 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 267 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
