1974 Renault 12 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Renault 12 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1974 Renault 12. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1974 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 595 kg more than 1974 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (177 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Renault 12. (96 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Renault 12 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 12 | Celica |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 177 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2600 mm |