1974 Renault 12 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Renault 12 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1974 Renault 12. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1974 Renault 12.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Renault 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Renault 12. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Renault 12 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | 12 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3010 mm |