1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1964 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1413 kg more than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1964 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Triumph |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 40 L |
