1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 227 kg more than 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Shadow | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 355 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 2345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5888 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2464 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3683 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 98 L |
