1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 584 kg more than 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 1534 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4587 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2113 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 2014 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 58 L |
