1974 Seat 133 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Seat 133 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1974 Seat 133. (43 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 133.
Because 1974 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 133. (55 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Seat 133 | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Seat | Jeep |
Model | 133 | Compass |
Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 842 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 55 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2634 mm |