1974 Skoda S 110 R vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Skoda S 110 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Skoda S 110 R would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1974 Skoda S 110 R. (51 HP @ 4650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1974 Skoda S 110 R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 940 kg more than 1974 Skoda S 110 R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Skoda S 110 R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Skoda S 110 R. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Skoda S 110 R. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1974 Skoda S 110 R has manual transmission. 1974 Skoda S 110 R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Skoda S 110 R | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Skoda | Chevrolet |
| Model | S 110 R | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1107 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4650 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 98 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 71 L |
