1974 Suzuki LJ 20 vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Suzuki | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LJ 20 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1991 |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
