1974 Suzuki LJ 20 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 | 2010 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
| Model | LJ 20 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
