1974 Toyota Corona vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1974 Toyota Corona. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1974 Toyota Corona.
Because 1974 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Toyota Corona. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Toyota Corona | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Corona | Cruze |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2253 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2685 mm |