1974 Triumph 2000 vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 328 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Triumph 2000 | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Triumph | Nissan |
| Model | 2000 | Z |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1573 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1326 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
