1974 Volvo 140 vs. 1976 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (100 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Volvo 140 | 1976 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | Volvo | Chrysler |
Model | 140 | 1609 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2670 mm |