1974 Volvo 140 vs. 1996 Acura SLX
To start off, 1996 Acura SLX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura SLX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura SLX (190 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Volvo 140 | 1996 Acura SLX | |
| Make | Volvo | Acura |
| Model | 140 | SLX |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2127 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4661 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2761 mm |
