1974 Volvo 140 vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 (129 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 (149 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Volvo 140 | 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
| Make | Volvo | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 140 | 146 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1712 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
