1974 Volvo 140 vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Volvo 140 | 2012 BMW X5 | |
Make | Volvo | BMW |
Model | 140 | X5 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2933 mm |