1974 Zastava 850 K vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 320 kg more than 1974 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Zastava 850 K | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Zastava | Renault |
| Model | 850 K | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1460 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
