1975 AC 428 vs. 1999 Dodge Charger

To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1975 AC 428. (298 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1975 AC 428. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 AC 428 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1975 AC 428 1999 Dodge Charger
Make AC Dodge
Model 428 Charger
Year Released 1975 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7003 cc 4700 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 298 HP 325 HP
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1080 kg
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 4760 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]