1975 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1975 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1975 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1975 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1975 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Alfasud | 62 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1186 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 59 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |
