1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Eagle | 62 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 5423 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3290 mm |
