1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle (122 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 40 kg more than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle (167 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Eagle | Celeste |
Year Released | 1975 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2350 mm |