1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle vs. 2003 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2003 Ford Mondeo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Ford Mondeo. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Mondeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 520 kg more than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle.
Because 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mondeo (175 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. (167 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle | 2003 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Eagle | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 80.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |