1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Eagle | Nessie |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2005 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2790 mm |
