1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 705 kg more than 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Alfa Romeo Eagle | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
Model | Eagle | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 269 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2845 mm |