1975 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1975 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Alfa Romeo GT (87 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 130 kg more than 1975 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Alfa Romeo GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Alfa Romeo GT. (140 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Alfa Romeo GT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Alfa Romeo GT | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | GT | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2040 mm |
