1975 Alpina 2002 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 1157 kg more than 1975 Alpina 2002.
Because 1975 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Alpina 2002 | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2002 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 303 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 2141 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2810 mm |
