1975 Alpina 3 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 334 kg more than 1975 Alpina 3.
Because 1975 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Alpina 3 | 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
Model | 3 | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 3783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2810 mm |