1975 Alpina 3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Alpina 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 499 kg more than 1975 Alpina 3.
Because 1975 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Alpina 3 | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
Model | 3 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2858 mm |